Traces of Obduracy: Imaginaries of ‘Social Inertia’ in the Process of Introducing Collaborative Housing in the Czech Republic

This paper explores the sociotechnical change necessary for the introduction of collaborative housing projects into the Czech super-homeownership housing regime. To better understand the obduracy of the current housing system, we examine the major barriers and threats to the implementation of such projects through a series of workshops with non-experts in selected cities. Our findings suggest that the housing system’s obduracy is related to social imaginaries that we conceptualise as the ‘imaginary of social inertia’. This form of imaginary, along with other factors such as a lack of supporting legal and financial infrastructures, creates a complex network of obstacles that reduce the likelihood of such housing projects gaining ground. In conclusion, our research emphasises the role of imaginaries in studying obduracy and thus provides valuable insights into the processes of urban sociotechnical change.

78 views

References

Aiken, T. G. 2017. ‘Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?’ European Public & Social Innovation Review 2 (1): 17-33. DOI: 10.31637/epsir.17-1.2

Archer, T. 2020. ‘The mechanics of housing collectivism: how forms and functions affect affordability.’ Housing Studies 37 (1): 73-102. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1803798

Czech Statistical Office. 2023. Indices of realized flat prices - 4. quarter of 2022. Retrieved March 30, 2023 from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/indices-of-realized-flat-prices-4-quarter-of-2022

Czischke D., C. Carriou, R. Lang 2020. ‘Collaborative Housing in Europe: Conceptualizing the Field.’ Housing, Theory and Society 37 (1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/14036096.2020.1703611

Färber, A. 2019. ‘How does ANT help us to rethink the city and its promises?’ Pp. 264–272 in A. Blok, I. Farías, C. Roberts (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory. London: Routledge.

Farías I., T. Bender 2010. Urban assemblages How actor-network theory change urban studies. London: Routledge.

Helamaa, A. 2019. ‘From marginal to mainstream? Analysing translations between the collaborative housing niche and the established housing sector in Finland.’ Built Environment 45 (3): 364-381. DOI: 10.2148/benv.45.3.364

Hommels, A. 2005. ‘Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies.’ Science, Technology, & Human Values 30 (3): 323–351. DOI: 10.1177/0162243904271759

Hommels, A. 2020. ‘STS and the City: Techno-politics, Obduracy and Globalisation.’ Science as Culture 29 (3): 410-416. DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1710740

Lang R., H. Stoeger 2018. ‘The Role of the Local Institutional Context in Understanding Collaborative Housing Models: Evidence from Austria.’ International Journal of Housing Policy 18 (1): 35–54. DOI: 10.1080/19491247.2016.1265265

Lux, M., P. Sunega 2020. ‘Using path dependence theory to explain housing regime change: The traps of super-homeownership.’ Critical Housing Analysis 7 (1): 25–35. DOI: 10.13060/23362839.2020.7.1.501

Malý Blažek, J., T. Hoření Samec, P. Kubala, V. Orcígr 2023. ‘Participativní bydlení: nová konceptualizace demokratických forem bydlení v České republice.’ Sociologický časopis 59 (2): 173-195. DOI: 10.13060/csr.2023.029

Pósfai, Z., C. Jelinek, S. Dević, A. Tomašević, I. Pavlović 2022. Catalytic Capital Investment as an Enabler of Affordable Rental and Cooperative Housing in Central and South-Eastern Europe: Full Research Report. Budapest: Periféria Policy and Research Center.

Strauss A., J. Corbin 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Tummers L. 2016. The re-emergence of co-housing in Europe. London: Routledge.

Document Type
article
ISSN
2336-2839
Volume / Issue
10 / 1
Pages
39-49
Date of publication
15.6.2023

Cite this article

copy
Kodenko Kubala, P. , J. Malý Blažek, V. Orcígr, T. Hoření Samec, M. Káňová, D. Tichý, J. Kubcová 2023. ‘Traces of Obduracy: Imaginaries of ‘Social Inertia’ in the Process of Introducing Collaborative Housing in the Czech Republic.’ Critical Housing Analysis 10 (1): 39-49. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2023.10.1.552