Home-Making under Revocable Housing: Appropriation and Futurity after the Nagorno-Karabakh Displacement in Yerevan

Authors: Harutyun Vermishyan ID, Milena Sarmakyan ID

This article examines how internally displaced persons from the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh negotiate the distinction between house and home in Yerevan, Armenia, through a study that draws on 30 narrative interviews conducted in 2022 and 2023. The study explores participants'' movement across three dominant post-displacement housing setting: collective housing, co-residing with family, and rental housing. It examines how participants’ experiences are shaped by the distinct conditions of entry, legitimate use, and temporal security afforded by each setting, rather than treating these settings as mere “options” that differ only in comfort and quality. By bringing together phenomenological ideas of home and materialist ideas of housing, the research develops a conceptual model of home-making that is grounded in practice and shaped by the interrelationship between housing settings, appropriation, and futurity. The research demonstrates that ‘not feeling at home’ is a practice that participants undertake in response to revocability in housing settings, and that participants'' actions of cleaning, repairing, and organising a space and the establishing of routines are all done amidst considerations/expectations of disruption. The research identifies distinct temporalities in institutional, relational, and market settings and demonstrates how constraints on spatial appropriation generate non-investment in a sense of home, even in housing that is materially sufficient. The research concludes with a discussion of the implications for housing policy that is grounded in a realist understanding of how to enable home-making, and how this requires moving beyond merely providing housing towards focusing on how to reduce revocability and to enable legitimate forms of appropriation that are modest and inexpensive.

PDF

0 views

References

Baeten, G., S. Westin, E. Pull, I. Molina 2017. ‘Pressure and Violence: Housing Renovation and Displacement in Sweden.’ Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49 (3): 631-651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16676271

Blomley, N. 2020. ‘Precarious Territory: Property Law, Housing, and the Socio-Spatial Order.’ Antipode 52 (1): 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12578

Boccagni, P., L. E. Perez Murcia, M. Belloni 2020. Thinking Home on the Move: A Conversation across Disciplines. Bingley: Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781839097225

Bormanis, E. 2019. ‘Spaces of Belonging and the Precariousness of Home.’ Puncta 2 (1): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.5399/PJCP.v2i1.2

Brun, C. 2015. ‘Home as a Critical Value: From Shelter to Home in Georgia.’ Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees 31 (1): 43-54. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40141

Brun, C., A. Fábos 2015. ‘Making Homes in Limbo? A Conceptual Framework.’ Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees 31 (1): 5-17. https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40138

Clandinin, D. J., F. M. Connelly 2004. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Cowan, D., B. Hardy 2020. ‘Regulating Home: A Case Study.’ Housing, Theory and Society 37 (5): 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1683066

Dalal, A. 2022. From Shelters to Dwellings: The Zaatari Refugee Camp. Bielefeld: transcript publishing

Després, C. 1991. ‘The Meaning of Home: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research and Theoretical Development.’ Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 8 (2): 96-115.

Eastmond, M. 2007. ‘Stories as Lived Experience: Narratives in Forced Migration Research.’ Journal of Refugee Studies 20 (2): 248-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem007

Elizondo, L. 2024. ‘Dwelling by Appropriation: Identity and Attachment in Low-Income Housing in Monterrey, Mexico.’ Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 39 (1): 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10083-5

Gibas, P. 2019. ‘Between Roots and Rhizomes: Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Home.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (3): 602-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12304

Gurney, C. M. 1999. ‘Pride and Prejudice: Discourses of Normalisation in Public and Private Accounts of Home Ownership.’ Housing Studies 14 (2): 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039982902

Handel, A. 2019. ‘What’s in a Home? Toward a Critical Theory of Housing/Dwelling.’ Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37 (6): 1045-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418819104

Harris, E., K. Brickell, M. Nowicki 2020. ‘Door Locks, Wall Stickers, Fireplaces: Assemblage Theory and Home (Un)Making in Lewisham’s Temporary Accommodation.’ Antipode 52 (5): 1286-1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12639

Heidegger, M. 1971. ‘Building Dwelling Thinking.’ Pp. 143-162 in Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by A. Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row

Hoolachan, J. 2022. ‘Making Home? Permitted and Prohibited Place-Making in Youth Homeless Accommodation.’ Housing Studies 37 (2): 212-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1836329

Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space, translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell

Madden, D., P. Marcuse 2024. In Defense of Housing: The Politics of Crisis. London: Verso

Perez Murcia, L. E. 2019. ‘The Sweet Memories of Home Have Gone: Displaced People Searching for Home in a Liminal Space.’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (9): 1515-1531. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1491299

Perez Murcia, L. E. 2020. ‘Remaking a Place Called Home Following Displacement.’ Pp. 468-476 in T. Edensor, A. Kalandides, U. Kothari (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Place. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453267-41

Perez Murcia, L. E. 2021. ‘Physically Sheltered but Existentially Homeless: Losing Home in the Aftermath of Conflict and Displacement.’ Migration Studies 9 (3): 1361-1379. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnaa020

Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Saugeres, L. 2002. ‘Of Tractors and Men: Masculinity, Technology and Power in a French Farming Community.’ Sociologia Ruralis 42 (2): 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00207

Steigemann, A. M., P. Misselwitz 2020. ‘Architectures of Asylum: Making Home in a State of Permanent Temporariness.’ Current Sociology 68 (5): 628-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120927755

Stephens, M., M. Lux, P. Sunega 2015. ‘Post-Socialist Housing Systems in Europe: Housing Welfare Regimes by Default?’ Housing Studies 30 (8): 1210-1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2015.1013090

Vermishyan, H. 2021. ‘Ideological and Cultural Practices in the Soviet Housing Space: The Case of Allocation and Obtaining of Apartments in Yerevan.’ Studies of Transition States and Societies 13 (2): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.58036/stss.v13i2.945

Please, login first to add a comment.
Document Type
article
ISSN
2336-2839
Volume / Issue
13 / 1
Pages
58-70
https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2026.13.1.607
Date of publication
13.6.2026
Keywords:
home ownership , homelessness and social exclusion , housing in developing countries , metropolitan housing and urban policy , minority ethnic groups and housing , residential environments and people , urban policy and planning

Cite this article

copy
Vermishyan, H. , M. Sarmakyan 2026. ‘Home-Making under Revocable Housing: Appropriation and Futurity after the Nagorno-Karabakh Displacement in Yerevan.’ Critical Housing Analysis 13 (1): 58-70. https://doi.org/10.13060/23362839.2026.13.1.607